reviews. previews. podcast. and more...

Join sisters NinJaSistah and Pandalicious and the rest of the ESH Crew each day as they discuss video games, tech gadgets, anime, manga... pretty much everything within the geek chic lifestyle.

From Xbox 360, PS3, Wii, and PC game reviews, previews, news, and gushings to audience questions and rumor mill seeding galore you'll find it here at ESH!
First Nerdgasm of 2010: ESH@CES Las Vegas!
 

Goings On



Search through the goodness that is ESH. Want to see if we are writing and chit chatting about the crap you're interested in.

Twitterings

     

    Advertisements



    Archives

    CES Coverage

    We went to CES and here's what we saw and molested.

    E3 Coverages

    One stop shopping for all of the ESH E3 goodness.

    Xbox 360 Stuffs

    Check out crew rantings on the XB360 platform.

    PS3 Things

    Yeah, we've talked about Sony stuff too, check em out!

    Wii Little Bits

    Get your Nintendo bits and bobbles here.

    Oh Hai! Anime-niacs

    Peep the stuff we've written about on the anime tip.

    Manga Love

    We less than three manga as well, so peep the manga reviews.

    ESH Photo Galleries

    Check out the snapshots we've taken at events and more here...


    The FFXIII Dub We Can Only Hope For

    posted @ 5/12/2009 05:07:00 PM by Douceswild


    This little gem popped up in my RSS a few minutes ago from IGN. This is some of the funniest dubbing I've heard in a long time. If Final Fantasy XIII sounds like this when I get it, I'm playing straight through the game, then playing it again. The little chocobo and the huge sex scorpion are the winners here.

    Labels: ,

    Finish what you start...

    New FFXIII Trailer

    posted @ 2/18/2009 11:49:00 AM by Douceswild


    I can't believe I missed the release of this trailer!! It just proves that the internet has become too vast for one man to patrol.

    For those of you eagerly anticipating Final Fantasy XIII, this trailer (by way of Kotaku) should cause your mouth to salivate even more. The combat looks awesome as well fast-paced. I can't wait to get my mitts on this title.

    Labels: , ,

    Finish what you start...

    FFXIII Bringing Black Back

    posted @ 1/14/2009 03:29:00 PM by Douceswild


    For the first time since FFVII, There will be a playable black character introduced into the Final Fantasy universe and might I add that he also has a cool affro and name, Sazh Kalzroy.

    Very little is known about this character whose picture was revealed in the latest issue of Japanese magazine, V Jump. If I could read the language, then I'd probably have more info. What we do know so far is that he loves the color green, has a soft spot for chocobos, and dual wields two pistols.

    Who else is willing to bet that Sazh Kalzroy will be the comic relief or "jiver" of the game? Full magazine scan below.


    Labels: ,

    Finish what you start...

    FFXIII Demo a.k.a. Salt In The Wound

    posted @ 1/29/2008 12:51:00 PM by Douceswild

    The number “13” has always been known as an unlucky number and that just may be the case for me as far as SquareEnix's Final Fantasy XIII is concerned.

    I’m at a crossroad right now. I’ve been pretty firm on my decision not to purchase a Playstion3 because I detest the price of the next-gen system. On the other hand, I’ve been a huge fan of the Final Fantasy series since FFIII. Seeing as how Squaresoft/Enix has had a longstanding relationship with Sony, I figured the chances of the series coming the the Xbox 360 was slim, but with the release of FFXI Online on Microsoft’s system and the announcement of another possible mmorpg by SqareEnix in the future, my hopes were high. I always knew in the back of my mind that I would have to make the decision to either pony up the cash for the PS3 or bid farewell to the series that I love so much. The time for the decision is now.

    The long time character designer of the Final Fantasy series, Tetsuya Nomura, not only swears by a 2008 release for FFXIII, but also teases at a playable demo on the Playstation Network a while before the game is released to show off the revamped battle system. Either two things are going to happen this year. I’ll either eat my words and breakdown and purchase the overpriced system or say goodbye to the FFXIII and /wrist when every PS3 owner sinks their teeth into the demo and then the full game. No matter the choice, you guys will probably see an grown gamer cry.

    Decisions, decisions.

    Labels: , , , ,

    Finish what you start...

    Turn-based Gaming's Ugly Head, Reared for Your Enjoyment

    posted @ 9/21/2007 12:16:00 PM by Alex J. Avriette
    People have been talking and talking and talking about turn-based gaming and whether it is realistic, enjoyable, profitable, sufficiently modern enough, and if non-turn-based gaming is even implementable. The problem with addressing a subject this complicated is that you cannot simply look at what is available or in use today and make a decision based upon that.

    Unfortunately for some, but I think fortunate for most, is the fact is, this will in be a giant piece, equal parts editorial, rant, history lesson, gaming paradigm discussion, or whatever else you care to call it. The simple fact is, this audience is primarily gamers. And gamers, despite the generally incorrect characterization, have a pretty solid attention span and focus when it comes to gaming.

    So let's dig in, shall we? The attention-span impaired can skip ahead to the last two paragraphs, but you'll miss all the juicy links and explanation defining these answers.
    We have a document thusly composed:
    1. The History of Turn-based Gaming
    2. The State of Turn-based Gaming (and attitudes)
    3. Where Turn-based Gaming is going (and attitudes)


    I will be talking about games in their entirety, so you may find something you think is a spoiler. If you don't like that, you're a whiny baby.

    The History of Turn-based Gaming



    Pong. There, I've said it. If we go way back in the annals of video games, we start at Pong. I think, therefore, we can say that video gaming started as turn-based. If we go further back, beyond video gaming, and discuss games like Chess and Mahjongg and Go, we see still more turn-based gaming.

    Even sports are largely turn-based. In American football, turns are very clearly defined. In Soccer, the turns are also defined, but are not formally delineated — I have the ball, therefore it is my turn. One can make an argument that this is actually a real-time strategy game, but the argument is incorrect; if Soccer (and Hurling, and Lacrosse, and Polo) were real-time strategy games, everyone would have a ball (many-to-many; more later). There would not be this notion of it is my and only my turn to act. The fact that we can intercept the ball or take out the person with the ball does not change the fact that it was their turn to act with the ball, and your turn to deprive them of their turn.

    Some of you may have seen a parallel here between sports and video games already. A perfect example of this would be the "bomb carrying" games, such as that in Unreal Tournament. One team had the ball (a bomb), and their objective was to deliver it to the enemy base, thus scoring a point. The opposing team's objective was to deprive the attacking team of their ball — but there was one ball. A minor digression here is that Capture the Flag is somewhat more of a real-time game than the deliver-the-bomb type games. In general, in CTF, a team can focus entirely on defense, offense, or a mixture of both. Frequently teams will have "campers" whose job it is to defend the flag, even at the cost of their own lives.

    I would definitely be remiss not to mention role-playing games (rôle, to be very specific about the wording), which will hereafter be referred to as RPGs. Unless I have missed some strange one (and I admit I have not participated in any LARPing), actual paper-pencil-and-dice RPGs are turn-based. I'm going to lump in the collectible card games here as well (such as Magic: The Gathering and the various Japanese flavors).

    So, where then, do we actually find non-turn-based gaming? In the history of video games, there have been very few games which are not turn-based. There is a segment of games, such as Kung Fu, Karnov, Contra, and Double Dragon on the 8-bit Nintendo (hereafter simply 'NES'), as well as Shinobi, Ninja Gaiden, Galaga, Gauntlet, and Centipede in the arcade, that are not explicitly turn-based. However, I am going to call them "flow-based" as they are not real-time, either. In fact, when these games started appearing on the NES, manufacturers started producing controllers with adjustable "turbo" buttons. With these new buttons, an adjustable rate of "fire" (that is, pushing of said button) could be programmed into the controller. This meant you could program (more on programming in realtime gaming later) your controller to respond to the "flow" of adversaries or obstacles more precisely than you could nominally do with your own thumbs.

    Typical side-scrollers, like Super Mario Brothers (almost all of them), Castlevania, and other adventure-side-scrollers were also flow-based games. Despite the fact that you stopped and looked around to smell the roses, graves, giant green pipes, and so on, you weren't doing that in real time because you couldn't decide that you needed to go all the way back to the beginning and let things happen differently. It was formulaic and therefore not what people are looking for in real-time gaming today.

    First person shooters, for the most part, are flow-based games, as well. In the typical rules (annihilate anything in front of you, with the occasional puzzle, such as in the Resident Evil and Silent Hill series, as well as the more recent Gears of War, and going back to Wolf3D, Quake, and Marathon), enemies come towards you in what feels like real time. However, except in very rare circumstances do we actually see the scenery/setting/enemies change in real time. This condition, that FPS games are actually flow-based, changes as intelligence is added (and I do not mean "bot" opponents). The more people you add to this system, the more chaotic it becomes, and the closer to realtime FPS become. Of course, if you add rules to the game as rapidly as you add players, you lose what makes it more real-time and it takes on a much more turn-based feeling. Consider the gradient between:

    1. Free-for-all Deathmatch
    2. Team Deathmatch
    3. Assault
    4. Capture the Flag


    (Apologies; Assault isn't in all games. I first found it in Unreal. It's essentially an assault-the-beachhead, occupy the capitol type game)

    There is a very clear gradient there from less to more turn-based rules. Of course, not on the list is "one-player" which is flow-based, and variations on the games (like "no respawn" or "time to respawn" modifications to Deathmatch) which make them even explicitly turn-based.

    But flow-based games are not, as I said, real-time, and they are not what gamers are looking for today. So let us look elsewhere. Combat games come very close to real-time strategy, for the most part. This is primarily because the fewer rules there are to combat, the less chance there is of some sort of "turn" creeping into the gameplay. It has been a long time since armies advanced on eachother in firing lines (er, maybe since the advent of marines?), spending time in between shots to reload and fire again at their standing opponents. Today, combat happens largely randomly. Nobody really wants to get into a fight on the enemy's "turn" to defend, and so we spend much of our time coming up with ways to disrupt the enemy's defense by using stealth, extra dimensions (air support, subsurface support), and outmoded weaponry (artillery and other siege weapons). When we replicate this in a game, we largely see real-time gaming happen. This is a very important point, and is discussed later.

    To confirm that gaming accurately reflects combat (at least technically), we can look at war and at combat sports. Consider the UFC an other "mixed martial arts" organizations. With simple rules like "no eye gouging" and "no digit manipulation", the simplest rules apply: beat the living hell out of your opponent. What we miss is the more subtle lack of rules, but huge divergence in techniques. One need only see Royce Gracie defeated by Matt Hughes to know that truly mixed multiple arts (and the latter's being a complete thug) that sticking to one set of rules (that of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu) is a good way to lose your turn. Hughes was able to manage the BJJ, as well as more typical manipulations, and in the end resorted to "beat the living hell out of your opponent with your elbows." The latter technique is not really taught in Gracie Jiu-Jitsu. Or Judo. Or Tae Kwon Do. Or Shaolin Kung Fu. But if you mix all those things up, you create an entirely chaotic system with zillions of interacting rules and techniques. It's no longer "if he grabs an arm, roll your hips," because that might get your ass into a kimura instead of around his side and onto his back.

    The same, of course, applies to warfare. The only real rules we have are "No nuclear/biological/chemical weapons." Many of the rules and expectations of war are created after the fact, rather than before. We don't go into war agreeing on the weapons we'll use, where we'll use them, and other things we kind of sort out afterwards. The Poles learned this in WWII, when they responded to Stukas and the general Blitzkrieg with... Cavalry. The point is that combat leaves us with largely real-time systems, based entirely on their huge complexity.

    Gaming consoles are getting to be downright beefy. They support incredibly complicated programs and storage. In theory, we can support a large set of combat (e.g., program in 255 different weapons, and arm 16,535 orcs and elves, and as they say, let god sort em out). This is mostly a good thing, since what most people are asking for is more real-time based combat, and less turn-based combat. I think we can show, however, that despite people whining and begging for real-time combat, their past behavior and buying trends have been quite the opposite. We can also discuss the "why" of this in some detail.

    The State of Turn-based Gaming



    I don't know whether it started there, but certainly one could say that a lot of the fracas surrounding real-time based gaming started with the Final Fantasy 10, 11, and 12 (hereafter FFX, FFXI, and FFXII, respectively) games. Square, who is one of those companies that likes to push the envelope a little (you know, the same way you can't help but push on an ugly bruise you've got, or to wiggle a broken finger), and they decided that after FFX, which was decidedly turn-based, that they were going to do away with that model, and instead try something new: real-time combat (and real-time character/npc interaction) in an RPG.

    The reason for this is people had been bitching about how tired turn-based RPGs were getting. It was almost as though you could change the dressing, the costumes, and so on, and the engine was the same. Good guys on the left or right, bad on the opposite side, and spells and weapons that crossed the gulf between them.

    What people forget is that older games, including Final Fantasy (FFIII for example, was still a sideways-action game, but the turns were taken in real-time), were changed in the past to be more turn-based and less real-time. Let's look, for example, at a game people probably didn't expect me to bring up: Street Fighter II. I think everyone has actually played this game at one time or another, so it makes a good example.

    When it first came out, it was pretty raw. People liked the characters and the story even (characters like Sagat, Dhalsim and Bison/Balrog were interesting at the time, and Chun-Li was just hot), but there were particular things you could do that rendered an opponent's ability to fight null. There were some interesting combinations, such as with Guile, a flying strong, followed by a sonic boom, followed by a roundhouse. These sorts of combinations would not only not be blockable (partly because of the low-high model of fighting/blocking), but would take off enormous portions (half to all) of an opponents HP.

    People squealed and whined. No longer could characters perform these kinds of combos. Or, rather, in newer releases, the combos just didn't work. In order to come up with damage combinations like that, one had to perform some pretty skillful work, and your average Shoryuken didn't really do much unless the opponent wasn't paying attention.

    And so the game evolved into where it was when it sort of became stagnant: moves happen much more quickly, do less damage, there are more characters and thus many more moves, and so on. What happened, for those that missed it, is the game became much more complicated. It tended from a very small set of characters (eight) to a very large set of characters (what, thirty?) with dozens of moves. This is called entropy. And, as we've seen above, entropy, chaos, is where we get the perception of "real-time" gaming. It is, precisely, the lack of rules, or so many rules that effective systems to exploit them do not exist.

    So why is a more chaotic, complex system, which is what people were asking for, received so poorly? People stopped playing SFII not when Mortal Kombat (you know you want it) or Soul Calibur came out (or Tekken or anything else at the time). They stopped when SFIII Super Phantomic came out and you couldn't tell what the hell was happening. Ryu, Ken, and Akuma (who is Akuma again?!) were all different and had these enormous bodies and silly moves, Guile was a chick called Cammy, and Bison had sort of ingested a whole lot of Blanca. I digress, but the point is, they took a simple, uncomplicated model, made it very complicated, and people hated it.

    Where Turn-based Gaming is going (and attitudes)



    So let me first start this section by telling you why you're wrong. I'm just that kind of guy. The problem is that every time somebody has made a system that approaches real-time, an angry mob of users have come after the developers with pitchforks and torches bitching and moaning about how complicated it is, and how much better it was when it was less complicated. If only they'd bump the revision, make the game prettier, easier to play, and have more content, it would be much better.

    Let's examine it a little. The more chaotic a game gets (don't misunderstand this; a game gets more chaotic the more rules it gets), the more it resembles real-time. The more turn-based a game becomes, the easier it is to play, to get used to, the smaller the slant on the learning curve, and the better its adoption becomes.

    A good example of this is an early RTS game, called Harpoon. This was available for the Mac (and I guess Windows), and had at least three major revisions. So at least five people have played it. I'm one of them. The notion was a hot cold war. NATO vs the USSR. It was really cool in later editions, when they included "scenario editors." I could take every airfield NATO owned, and equip them with thousands of F-14's toting AIM-54's, every single Russian base with even more TU-16's, and do the same with surface and subsurface warfare. Thankfully, I didn't have to control all this. It was incredibly complicated to have fifteen thousand (or more!) units all interacting in an area that spanned from Maine to Oslo to Gibraltar and Turkey. There were lots of rules: a Tomahawk TLAM has a range of 1100 nautical miles. So even if you manage to fire off 5,000 of them, and they're all TLAM-N, but you're 1150 nm away, you aren't going to blow up your target (silly, right? that's a gigaton!). Your helicopters fall out of the sky if they fly more than 400 miles (which isn't true of Pave Hawk/Pave Low, but then Harpoon didn't have any SOCOM operatives). Your submarines aren't useful if they run aground. SOSUS can detect you if you're not really sneaky. I could go on. The point is, nobody can keep up with all this system. It's got hundreds of rules, so it appears very ordered. However, what we experience is sheer chaos.


    On the Positive Side

    The process of developing a spend plan forces commanders to look at their resource requirements and gives resource managers (RMs) their best chance to ensure that the command's expenditures are fiscally responsible. This is a good first step because validating requirements is important.

    On the Negative Side

    First, requirements in a contingency environment tend to be fluid. What a commander considers mission essential today can be an afterthought tomorrow. Second, current financial management systems were not designed to tie unit spend plans to actual execution. Third, physically separated RMs and unreliable communications equipment can lead to miscommunication and imperfect fiscal situational awareness.


    We should also talk about where real-time gaming can and cannot go. The easiest example of real-time combat is, well, combat. Can you tell whether the above is referring to a more structured combat or a less structured combat? What the author is describing is applying an enormously complex set of rules to encompass an enormously complex, theoretically rule-less scenario: combat in Afghanistan.

    Combat happens in a many-to-many (purchase; it's about US$30) situation. Many marines engage many guys in sweatpants with automatic rifles and rpg's. The only reason this works at all is that each marine has (ostensibly; it depends on who you ask) a brain, each badguy (same disclaimer) has a brain, and everyone is using their brain to attack the other side. They attack as many as they are able to at once, but no more, and generally, no less. An RPG has a blast radius of X feet, marines have a density of Y marines per X feet radius, and therefore the guys in sweatpants attack Y/X marines at once. We can extrapolate this to automatic rifles, hand grenades, atom bombs, and so on (the RPG link is in eXile #189; they're changing formats, so it won't last forever).

    Final Fantasy moved from left-to-right turn based stuff to a semi-realtime "thingy" with FFXII. They're apparently "improving" on this in FFXIII. Where can it go? Well, it can take the approach of FFXI and add more brains to the solution (this is the one and only mention I will make of MMORPGs and other MMO silliness). It can also take the approach of FFXII, which is to create "gambits." That approach is of course stupid (warning, long rambling bloggish review). The real-time-ness of FFXII was accomplished by programming characters since it was impossible to engage multiple enemies at once with multiple characters at once. Gambits can be more or less summarized (though not succinctly) thusly (emphasis mine):


    Now onto the major aspect of Final Fantasy XII – the game play. I guess I'll start off with the most controversial aspect, the whole gambit system. It would be best to note that the battle system isn't turn based like traditional RPGs. Rather, it's similar to KOTOR and FFXI. You have control of one of the six characters and the other characters need to have gambits set up so you can control them. At a time, there is only 3 characters (with sometimes the occasional guest) in play but if your first team of 3 were to be wiped out, then you can simply switch to your reserve team. This is awesome; it allows the whole party a chance to fight before a Game Over. But gambits have two aspects to them. The first is the target and the second is the action. You have to actually purchase gambits but the target can be anything from the enemy with the lowest HP to the ally whose HP is under 30%. This allows for intricate customization of your characters. The last part is of course the action which is basically an spell or item you are able to use. So some possible gambit combinations could be the target being Ally with 30% HP or less and the action could be cure magic. Or the target could be Self: Blind and the action could be Esuna. Easy how that works. Actually, I never got too involved with the gambit system in my play through of this game. I of course had the basics but being the control freak I am, I usually just preferred manually taking control of the character. The gambit system is a very good system though to control the computer. My only complaint is that you have to buy the gambits. That just seems kind of dumb.


    Face it, folks, you're single-threaded, even if your cpus have multiple cores and your environment is as gigantic as final fantasy's or Halo's. You can only do one thing at once. You can sum up in a program (FF called these "gambits") what you want a character to do, but that's only as good as your programming and the semantics of the language (and FFXII's gambits were asinine when compared to even something as simple as batch files or awk, let alone a mature language like c or a postmodern language like perl6 or python/ruby — the latter category of which people have proven they can learn very young and very quickly).

    So games are going to get more chaotic. I guarantee you in Halo 3 you're going to see more badguys attacking you at once, and you're going to be supported by more marines, and you're going to be able to play on enormous maps with many other people over the fancy interwebs, and it's all going to feel very real time. But you're still only going to be doing one thing at once.

    Oblivion is my first Elder Scrolls adventure, so I wasn't really sure what to expect. Having come off one enormous RPG some months ago (Final Fantasy XII), I wondered what's in store for me with Oblivion.


    This means in order to give players what they really want, game manufacturers have to give them what they're able to actually use: enormous (I always thought Oblivion was like Fable on quaaludes, but I know a lot of people who liked it) content. Don't just give players a set of maps over San Francisco in Project Gotham Racing, open up the whole city. You've got the storage to do that; license it from Google if you have to. Get it daily from the internet. Have people pay for subscriptions for their own locale so they can lay down some hell on I-95 between Virginia and North Carolina (and for crissakes, lemme have that rental Cadillac DTS so I can do some high-speed, low-center-of-gravity, weighs-four-tons donuts at 90mph).

    Let them play with more other people, because they are not capable of doing a many-to-many system. This is not so hard. You have multiple cores in the PS3 and the 360. What's actually limiting these games is bandwidth (which is stupid — I get twice as much bandwidth in the parking lot of my local public library as the entire company I worked for in 1997), programmer ability (because people are not good at multiplicity, programming for multiple threads and multiple cpu's is pretty hard), and storage. Storage can be obviated by having online content, storage on the local machine (the Xbox elite being a good example) and good bandwidth to the machine (for sucking down content).

    When they're not playing with other people, give them access to those many-player features including game models, maps, and so on. Making a game only multi-player or only single-player is stupid. Nobody's doing it explicitly anymore, but you don't have to play Battlestations: Midway very long to realize that you need to be online. Nor do you have to play Chromehounds or Armored Core 4 too long to realize you need to be online.

    So, the solutions, in order, are:

    1. Give people what they can use, not what they ask for: huge scale in maps, textures, game models, npc's, and characters.
    2. Don't create complicated game models. They may appear slick when you're reading the code, but when I've got eight buttons and three joysticks to contend with, I'm short a friggin' finger, okay?
    3. Don't skimp on single-player, turn-based stuff. It's your bread and butter. It really is. The people that want fancy gaming models can and do pay for much higher end stuff (like flightsims with multiple displays, throttles, rudders, yokes, and so on), and it tends to be highly, highly specialized. The way to do this is to make sure you have a common engine for both sides of the game — single and multi-player — and base the game on that.
    4. Software developers: push console development. Stop thinking about how to make the Master Chief's visor shinier and more DX10/OpenGL'er, and instead figure out how to get 192 people playing in a single game so you can start thinking about how to have a real Kursk or Bull Run in your games. AMD is going to help you out with many-core chips, ram is cheap, bandwidth is getting bigger. This means you need better controllers, better displays (like support for — gasp — multiple displays or PiP), and more storage. Lots of storage. Both non-volatile storage (whose bright idea was it to put an HD-DVD player on the 360 and a Blue-Ray on the PS3 but not build games on those platforms?) I expect to see terabyte consoles. Soon. Get moving.
    5. Eat your own dogfood. If you're developing Halo, have meetings in Halo. Hold the next corporate jerk-off in Halo instead of at the Moscone Center or at the Seattle Convention Center. Your employees will like this. If they don't, you screwed the game up. If you're developing PGR or GTA, have your employees drive to the damn meeting. Maybe have them shoot eachother. I dunno; take the idea, run with it. Beta testing and QAing is not "dogfooding".


    I think that mostly covers everything. Everything above boils down to three concepts, which nobody would have accepted, had I not drooled my way through this:


    • All non-turn-based gaming is actually turn-based gaming that consists of depriving the other player(s) of their turn.
    • The more complicated a game gets, the more difficult it gets, and the more real-time-ish it becomes. Life's complicated. Difficulty is not always a good thing in life or in a game.
    • The people asking for outlandish things from video games are very loud, but in the end, they don't add up to too many users. I bitch and moan that an FD3S doesn't sound like a Wankel in PGR or NFS:MW, but I'm one of precisely three people that do. All people really want is big explosions and absolutely gorgeous characters (because that's who they are!!!)

    You've just read a wikipedia-free post.

    Disclaimer: I used to work for Microsoft. They didn't pay me for any of this. Hi, Lance.



    Labels: , , ,

    Finish what you start...

    Magic Jewels

    posted @ 3/19/2007 09:13:00 PM by MagicMystic
    Douce isn't the only one who finds the occasional gem when tooling around on ye ol' interweb.

    For those of you who have seen Advent Children this Korean music video may seem a bit familiar. If you ever wondered what Tifa and Loz might look like in real life, here's your chance to see them...





    Labels: , , , , ,

    Finish what you start...

    Pandalicious Doesn't Read This Website

    posted @ 1/22/2007 10:42:00 PM by Ninjasistah
    Really, she doesn't. She just shows up for the podcast to lend her "sexy voice" and will put a post up if I brow beat her about it... so I think it's only fair that I steal her thunder and put up a WoW post of my own.

    Now, I don't play WoW... never have, and doubt I ever will, but I do find news about video games being turned into [even possibly turned into] movies interesting... so when I found this article [thanks to Kotaku.com you know I had to lend my few cents.

    So here's the excerpt from the interview that Empire did with Blizzard Vice President of Development Itzik Ben Bassat that I find interesting:
    Q:There's a World of Warcraft Movie in the works, do you expect that to enjoy similar success?

    A: We've been working on that movie for years! If people only knew how many years we put in to closing this movie deal. We're very happy with our progress though, it was really difficult for us as a company to find some we trusted to work with. With Legendary, well, they did Batman Returns and the new Superman so we knew that was a company we wanted to work with. Bringing Warcraft to the movies is the next step for us, we want to let people bring World of Warcraft into other aspects of their lives. After all, we're competing for people's entertainment time, whether it's listening to music watching TV or going to the cinema. Our goal is to provide the best entertainment out there.

    Q: Any news on when we can expect to see the film?
    Hollywood has it's own pace but we�re working as hard as we can to push it forwards.


    And while I'm not a huge fan of RPG's in general, I do think that they can be the foundation of good, if not great feature length films. Being based in fantasy doesn't hurt, and can draw that diverse 18-24 audience that Hollywood desperately wants to bone pander to. Personally I'd like to see Final Fantasy VII as a movie, and not a CGI one either. I'd love a live action trilogy of Final movies actually. Wouldn't you?

    Now if I could just figure out some way to work Samuel L. Jackson into the flick...

    Labels: , , , , ,

    Finish what you start...

    Time For A New Podcast Episode!

    posted @ 11/20/2006 01:50:00 AM by Ninjasistah
    It's new podcast episode day again... this time, it's the super "buy me stuff" edition.

    Well, it's not the final "buy me stuff" edition as we will undoubtedly have a few more of these types of shows between now and New Years Day, but it's a good way to start off the holiday shopping season.

    Pandalicious pimps Angel Sanctuary and Final Fantasy XII while MagicMysticGrl shines the "perfect gift" light on the works of Sang Sun Park with special emphasis on texture in manga. [Or Manwha if you are a purist] Le Oro gets in the mix as well, then NinJaSistah rounds out the show with a spotlight on the movie Boiler Room, the PS2 video game God of War, and the XB360 title Viva Piñata. Grab a cup of egg nog and enjoy Episode 27: Gift Guide-O-Rama!

    Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

    Finish what you start...

    New Podcast Episode Day!

    posted @ 11/13/2006 12:55:00 AM by Ninjasistah
    Once again, it's new podcast day here at ESH, and this one is a doosy!


    Poor Pandalicious and MagicMysticGrl had to deal with NinJaSistah after she had downed an Amp tall boy and a can of Coke... pray for them y'all!

    Seriously though, this week the ladies cover everything [and I do mean everything] from the latest Candy Bitch, to an introduction to American manga in the form of Death At Deaths Door, first findings on Final Fantasy XII and the evolution of gaming through console input devices. I won't even mention the Care Bear references, the WoWalicious sweepstakes winner, or why caffeine is good for you.

    Just try and figure out where you stand on the punny vs. birate debate.

    This is one of our longer podcast episodes folks, but it's funny as hell. Just listen to it already.

    Oh yeah, before I forget, congrats to our latest Candy Bitch TimboSteve!

    Labels: , , , , , ,

    Finish what you start...

    New Podcast Episode

    posted @ 11/06/2006 12:03:00 AM by Ninjasistah
    It's new podcast episode day, and here we have "Episode 25: Scare Tactics" ready for your consuption.

    In this episode of the podcast MagicMysticGrl talks about Kaku ren Bo, Pandalicious rants about the lack of cultural diversity in the SquEnix Final Fantasy franchise, and NinJaSistah brings it all home with a "Do you need a next-gen console" reality check question. Give this episode a good listen, share it with your friends... and don't forget to hit up www.electricsistahood.com/freshit.html to pimp us to your buddies.


    Labels: , , , ,

    Finish what you start...

    Sixaxis Battery Woe No

    posted @ 10/18/2006 11:40:00 PM by Ninjasistah
    Sure, I'm a little behind, but I HAD to go to the damn hockey game. I do more than just game you know. [I also love football, and professional boxing. I am what you many would refer to as a "down ass chick"] But this little tid-bit of info did not escape my radar.

    So the PS3 controller known as "SIXAXIS" has a flaw. Imagine that, some part of the PS3 has some kind of flaw. While most of the sites that have been writing about the controller specs, they haven't really focused on just how much of a problem this flaw presents.

    So here's the deal on the Bluetooth controller. It has a rechargeable lithium ion battery built in, as in the rechargeable battery can not come out of the controller. Now while the battery is rechargeable, to fully charge it through your PS3 via USB will take about 2 hours. Once the battery is charged it should get about 30 hours of use before requiring a recharge. Not bad performance if it's true, but the estimated battery life number have never been all that universal. I know you are saying, "sounds ok to me, where da prob Bob?" The "prob" is that anyone that has ever used a device that has a lithium ion battery knows that over time and usage, lithium ion batteries decay and die. With each recharge, a little less of the battery can actually recharge and soon, your battery will shuffle off it's mortal coil and move on to battery heaven... and since this battery is hard wired into your remote, it means that your remote is a paperweight in waiting. [hehe, I crack myself up sometimes]

    Maybe we should have a "how fast can you turn your PS3 controller into a paperweight" sweepstakes here at ESH. I figure a year of Final Fantasy and Socom playing ought to do it. I mean, not for nothing but at least you have the option of rechargeable battery PACKS with the XB360, or regular battery powered battery packs... if a pack dies, you just replace the battery pack which is cheaper than buying a new controller.

    Pay for the potential folks... through the nose. Fuck you Sony for making me sound like an Xbox fangirl. No lube either.

    Labels: , , , ,

    Finish what you start...

    Final Fantasy Unlimited

    posted @ 10/15/2006 05:59:00 PM by Ninjasistah
    Here's one I never heard of.

    Anime Network OnDemand started airing a series called Final Fantasy Unlimited this week, and I have to say, I'm confused. There's a chocobo in it, a set of twins that are looking for their parents who have disappeared. Yu and Ai Hayakawa [yes, that's pronounced "you" and "I"] are looking for our, er, their parents that went missing when the black light thingie spawned the red flying thingie and the white flying thingie fought.

    Did I mention that Yu and Ai had to travel to a parallel dimension named "Wonderland" on a train that only appears at 13 seconds after the 13th minute after midnight on the night of a full moon? I didn't? Oh, well, I should have. The kids end up having to fight a big magic mushroom that they can't beat, but this dude who has forgotten his name but has a weapon that uses bullets of color to summon an "aeon" I guess to battle, beats the mushroom for them. Yeah, that's what's going on in the first episode.

    I have no idea what is going on here, but I can't turn away.

    Any one out there know what the hell this is?

    Labels: , ,

    Finish what you start...

    Final Fantasy Game Leaked?

    posted @ 10/03/2006 12:54:00 PM by Ninjasistah
    Ok, I remember when KH2 was leaked over the interwebs before its official release last year, so when I heard about the new Final Fantasy game being leaked I took it with a minor grain of salt. I knew that it was *possible* but figured that it was not probably because Squenix, er Square Enix, wouldn't make the same mistake twice.

    I really need to stop presuming and assuming things.

    Upon double and triple checking, it seems that the files of the Final Fantasy XII game that people have been finding on ye olde interweb are actually viable and people have been downloading them. Now, unless you have done naughty and illegal things to your PS2 [you naughty, dregs of society you] getting the file won't do you much good.

    I just think that the timing of this "leak" is suspicious... the game is accidentally leaked to the public a few weeks before the release? I dunno, maybe it's the hidden conspiracy theorist in me, but it seems to me all this "leak" has done is put a whole bunch of focus on the Final Fantasy game pre-commercial release that it may not have had otherwise.

    FFXII was leap-frogged in the hype press by the trinity that is FFXIII which probably didn't go over well with the people who make the real money over there at Sony and Squenix. If people are waiting and looking forward to games that are slated for 07, they might overlook the game coming out now in 06. That statement has to send shivers down a stockholders spine. So how do you get some quick publicity for a game that you have coming out at the end of the month? You can't put together a contest or sweepstakes fast enough, and it might not reach your intended audience. A email newsletter won't do you much good either because between junk mail filters, and people just throwing out emails before reading them if they are low on time [or lack focusing brain power at the moment] your message still won't get out. But if you say, accidentally leak out a fully function version of the game that only a limited amount of your existing base can play, that will get the attention of the blogosphere and the fanboys, or that will get people focused on trying to find this pirated treasure of free gamitude so that your game name recognition goes up in the search engines, well, you might be on to something there. Get the people talking about the game, looking for it, and those slight few that have it and can play it will go on and on about how good it is [even if it sucks] because they have it and can play it before everyone else.

    I call shenanigans on the whole thing!


    Labels: , , , , ,

    Finish what you start...

    I've Been Lying to You All

    posted @ 9/11/2006 11:16:00 PM by MagicMystic
    It is time for me to come clean and spill my dirty little secret.

    Ok, here it is. Although I have owned Final Fantasy XII for years and have started it several times I haven't ever completed the game. So, when I watched Advent Children I didn't really understand what was going on. Whenever anyone asks if I've seen the movie or played the game I totally rave about how cool they were and how much I liked them. I've been living a lie and it's nice to finally get that off my chest.

    So what have you been lying about to look cooler to those geeks in the anime/gaming worlds. Do you not actually know what EVA means? Have you never played one of the multitudes of Mario games out there? Do you exaggerate how long you have been into anime/gaming? Do you have difficulty telling Anime from American animation styles?

    Whatever your little secret, admitting it is the first step to getting some help. Maybe we can clear up some misconceptions.


    Labels: , , , ,

    Finish what you start...